Comments on: Unexploded Thermitic Material in WTC Dust? Surely Not http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/07/unexploded-thermitic-material-in-wtc-dust-surely-not/ Theology, Culture, Politics, Technology, Reviews, and Other Commentary From a Reformed Evangelical Conservative Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:31:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: David http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/07/unexploded-thermitic-material-in-wtc-dust-surely-not/comment-page-1/#comment-9231 David Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:30:56 +0000 http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=2044#comment-9231 Nope, no update yet , I would imagine I probably won't get one. Thanks for your input! Nope, no update yet , I would imagine I probably won’t get one. Thanks for your input!

]]> By: Peter A Smith http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/07/unexploded-thermitic-material-in-wtc-dust-surely-not/comment-page-1/#comment-9229 Peter A Smith Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:12:14 +0000 http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=2044#comment-9229 Have you had an update yet? I'm a Mechanical Engineer for IBM so the subject is a little outside my field but when I read the report I found much of the methodology flawed particularly with respect to the provenance of the dust sample and the lack of any well documented control testing of either dusts sample from other place in NY or other large City or of the actual paints known to be used in the construction of the WTC and the surrounding buildings. Have you had an update yet? I’m a Mechanical Engineer for IBM so the subject is a little outside my field but when I read the report I found much of the methodology flawed particularly with respect to the provenance of the dust sample and the lack of any well documented control testing of either dusts sample from other place in NY or other large City or of the actual paints known to be used in the construction of the WTC and the surrounding buildings.

]]> By: Aaron http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/07/unexploded-thermitic-material-in-wtc-dust-surely-not/comment-page-1/#comment-9062 Aaron Sat, 01 Aug 2009 06:50:53 +0000 http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=2044#comment-9062 I'd really be interested to know your findings on this subject as well. By the way your analysis of this set of data was a gem. As you mentioned, 90% of the information on this particular subject is completely biased or unreliable. It'd be nice to get some info on the credibility of this source from someone who isn't a conspiracy nut. I’d really be interested to know your findings on this subject as well. By the way your analysis of this set of data was a gem. As you mentioned, 90% of the information on this particular subject is completely biased or unreliable. It’d be nice to get some info on the credibility of this source from someone who isn’t a conspiracy nut.

]]> By: David http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/07/unexploded-thermitic-material-in-wtc-dust-surely-not/comment-page-1/#comment-8992 David Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:10:54 +0000 http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=2044#comment-8992 Haven't had a reply yet ... Haven’t had a reply yet …

]]> By: Phil http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/07/unexploded-thermitic-material-in-wtc-dust-surely-not/comment-page-1/#comment-8984 Phil Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:05:05 +0000 http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=2044#comment-8984 So David, What did your friend at Georgia Tech report about the thermite paper? Phil So David,

What did your friend at Georgia Tech report about the thermite paper?

Phil

]]>