<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shack Author William P. Young Denies Penal Substitution (MP3)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/</link>
	<description>Theology, Culture, Politics, Technology, Reviews, and Other Commentary From a Reformed Evangelical Conservative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tear down &#8220;The Shack&#8221; &#171; Thideology</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-14320</link>
		<dc:creator>Tear down &#8220;The Shack&#8221; &#171; Thideology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-14320</guid>
		<description>[...] is a short list of out-and-out heresies contained in this horrid piece of writing. And here is a review of the book where you may listen to an interview with the author where the author actually denies the substitutionary atonement of Christ (a pretty important [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a short list of out-and-out heresies contained in this horrid piece of writing. And here is a review of the book where you may listen to an interview with the author where the author actually denies the substitutionary atonement of Christ (a pretty important [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 13 Different Heresies in The Shack- The Crosstalk Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-14314</link>
		<dc:creator>13 Different Heresies in The Shack- The Crosstalk Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-14314</guid>
		<description>[...] Listen here as William Paul Young denies the penal substitutionary atonemenf of Christ, cardinal doctrine, folks. (Fast forward to hear the specific denial 16 minutes in.)        blog comments powered by Disqus  var disqus_url = &#039;http://www.crosstalkblog.com/2010/02/13-different-heresies-in-the-shack/ &#039;; var disqus_container_id = &#039;disqus_thread&#039;; var facebookXdReceiverPath = &#039;http://www.crosstalkblog.com/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comment-system/xd_receiver.htm&#039;;   var DsqLocal = { &#039;trackbacks&#039;: [ ], &#039;trackback_url&#039;: &#039;http://www.crosstalkblog.com/2010/02/13-different-heresies-in-the-shack/trackback/&#039; }; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Listen here as William Paul Young denies the penal substitutionary atonemenf of Christ, cardinal doctrine, folks. (Fast forward to hear the specific denial 16 minutes in.)        blog comments powered by Disqus  var disqus_url = &#39;http://www.crosstalkblog.com/2010/02/13-different-heresies-in-the-shack/ &#39;; var disqus_container_id = &#39;disqus_thread&#39;; var facebookXdReceiverPath = &#39;http://www.crosstalkblog.com/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comment-system/xd_receiver.htm&#39;;   var DsqLocal = { &#39;trackbacks&#39;: [ ], &#39;trackback_url&#39;: &#39;http://www.crosstalkblog.com/2010/02/13-different-heresies-in-the-shack/trackback/&#39; }; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moriel Archive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Those that deny ‘penal substitution’ are “the enemies of the cross of Christ” [Philippians 3:18]</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-11149</link>
		<dc:creator>Moriel Archive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Those that deny ‘penal substitution’ are “the enemies of the cross of Christ” [Philippians 3:18]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-11149</guid>
		<description>[...] the blog site of a David Westerfield on this link http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/there is a very frank posting concerning the denial of penal substitution by William Paul Young, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the blog site of a David Westerfield on this link <a href="http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/there" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/there</a> is a very frank posting concerning the denial of penal substitution by William Paul Young, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Westerfield</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-10937</link>
		<dc:creator>David Westerfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-10937</guid>
		<description>Bart,

I have no doubt Young is a great guy. I&#039;m not questioning any of that, nor do I in this blog post. And the issue is not one of just being ignorant of doctrine. Ignorance and outright denial are two different things. The issue is one of Young knowing the teaching and then denying it, not just being ignorant. And the issue in discussion above is a belief that lies at the very core of the Gospel itself. Did or did not Jesus suffer the wrath of His Father that we deserve, in our place, in order that we could be accepted before Him? Was he a sacrifice of atonement or not, a propitiation, in the historic, Biblical sense? Young denies this. That&#039;s a problem because that teaching lies at the core of the Gospel itself.

It&#039;s not as if Young is ignorant to these things. From the interview, he sounds very knowledgeable (and to his credit, very kind and sincere when discussing them). This is not a condemnation of the man, for I have no idea of the state of his soul, in same way he has no idea of the state of mine. Only God judges the person. We are supposed to use discernment though of teaching that comes in, as Jesus said, like leaven and ruins the whole batch, no matter who it is coming from.

There is also a difference between heresy and error. You are right to say that even as believers we are filled with untrue beliefs or thinking, or error. There are things I believe in my head that I&#039;m still working out in my heart. This is exactly one of the reasons we still sin even while saved, wrong beliefs. So it is one thing to believe erroneous things that are non-essential, i.e. that won&#039;t lead you to hell. However, heresy is not just error (as you defined it above), but outright knowledgeable denial of a particular essential teaching that leads one to hell. It is quite different from mere error to deny or disbelieve something that lies at the heart of the message of Scripture, and particularly the Gospel itself. That is the issue here. And again, I&#039;m not saying I know Young&#039;s current or even final state. The Lord only knows that. The only thing we&#039;re speaking of is what he is espousing as the truth of God as it pertains to salvation, which is counter to what Scripture teaches on that point.

I hope this reply finds you well and that your joy will be full in Christ, Bart!

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bart,</p>
<p>I have no doubt Young is a great guy. I&#8217;m not questioning any of that, nor do I in this blog post. And the issue is not one of just being ignorant of doctrine. Ignorance and outright denial are two different things. The issue is one of Young knowing the teaching and then denying it, not just being ignorant. And the issue in discussion above is a belief that lies at the very core of the Gospel itself. Did or did not Jesus suffer the wrath of His Father that we deserve, in our place, in order that we could be accepted before Him? Was he a sacrifice of atonement or not, a propitiation, in the historic, Biblical sense? Young denies this. That&#8217;s a problem because that teaching lies at the core of the Gospel itself.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not as if Young is ignorant to these things. From the interview, he sounds very knowledgeable (and to his credit, very kind and sincere when discussing them). This is not a condemnation of the man, for I have no idea of the state of his soul, in same way he has no idea of the state of mine. Only God judges the person. We are supposed to use discernment though of teaching that comes in, as Jesus said, like leaven and ruins the whole batch, no matter who it is coming from.</p>
<p>There is also a difference between heresy and error. You are right to say that even as believers we are filled with untrue beliefs or thinking, or error. There are things I believe in my head that I&#8217;m still working out in my heart. This is exactly one of the reasons we still sin even while saved, wrong beliefs. So it is one thing to believe erroneous things that are non-essential, i.e. that won&#8217;t lead you to hell. However, heresy is not just error (as you defined it above), but outright knowledgeable denial of a particular essential teaching that leads one to hell. It is quite different from mere error to deny or disbelieve something that lies at the heart of the message of Scripture, and particularly the Gospel itself. That is the issue here. And again, I&#8217;m not saying I know Young&#8217;s current or even final state. The Lord only knows that. The only thing we&#8217;re speaking of is what he is espousing as the truth of God as it pertains to salvation, which is counter to what Scripture teaches on that point.</p>
<p>I hope this reply finds you well and that your joy will be full in Christ, Bart!</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-10936</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-10936</guid>
		<description>&quot;I want to remind us all that many of those who have gone before us in church history have died, given their lives, over doctrine. These are not unimportant things. Heresy is called heresy for a reason, because those who believe heretical doctrines result in them being condemned, because though they confess Christ with their lips, they disbelieve the Biblical Gospel in their hearts. The book of Jude is a stark warning speaking to this point. I suggest we listen to it.&quot;

Not having read &#039;The Shack&#039; (yet), I find this discussion interesting for two reasons.  First, I heard Mr. Young speak this weekend (and was blessed to join him for lunch).  He is an incredible person with a deep love for Jesus and others.  Offer your questions of doctrine - they are interesting.  But do not condemn the man for you only condemn yourself.

Second, the desire for orthodoxy is dissolving for me (in the traditional, evangelical sense).  Is knowing Jesus central?  Absolutely.  But can we know Him perfectly?  Not yet.  We are all filled with heresies (i.e., untrue beliefs) about God.  Have you believed everything you believe today since birth?  No, you have learned and developed (hopefully).  We will continue in that path with God&#039;s grace.  Do not hold to your arguments so tightly because you will fail to embrace Jesus.  It is much more important that we join together, live out our trust in Jesus as Lord and care for each other as family.  In my short time with Mr. Young, I am certain he would welcome even those who criticize and attack him into loving, compassionate conversations.  If you want grace in your life, start living it with others.  That&#039;s probably more of a challenge for me than for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I want to remind us all that many of those who have gone before us in church history have died, given their lives, over doctrine. These are not unimportant things. Heresy is called heresy for a reason, because those who believe heretical doctrines result in them being condemned, because though they confess Christ with their lips, they disbelieve the Biblical Gospel in their hearts. The book of Jude is a stark warning speaking to this point. I suggest we listen to it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not having read &#8216;The Shack&#8217; (yet), I find this discussion interesting for two reasons.  First, I heard Mr. Young speak this weekend (and was blessed to join him for lunch).  He is an incredible person with a deep love for Jesus and others.  Offer your questions of doctrine &#8211; they are interesting.  But do not condemn the man for you only condemn yourself.</p>
<p>Second, the desire for orthodoxy is dissolving for me (in the traditional, evangelical sense).  Is knowing Jesus central?  Absolutely.  But can we know Him perfectly?  Not yet.  We are all filled with heresies (i.e., untrue beliefs) about God.  Have you believed everything you believe today since birth?  No, you have learned and developed (hopefully).  We will continue in that path with God&#8217;s grace.  Do not hold to your arguments so tightly because you will fail to embrace Jesus.  It is much more important that we join together, live out our trust in Jesus as Lord and care for each other as family.  In my short time with Mr. Young, I am certain he would welcome even those who criticize and attack him into loving, compassionate conversations.  If you want grace in your life, start living it with others.  That&#8217;s probably more of a challenge for me than for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-8632</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-8632</guid>
		<description>Well that&#039;s fine, but I didn&#039;t conduct the interview :) Here&#039;s the guy that did, Kendall Adams,  as cited at the very top of my post ... http://alwaysreformingtoscripture.blogspot.com/ ... but I would also like you do a better interview than this one. I believe he really pressed Young on important points that we all needed clarification on. It&#039;s really easy to critique something in hind sight from behind a keyboard. I think Kendall did a great job personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s fine, but I didn&#8217;t conduct the interview <img src='http://www.davidwesterfield.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Here&#8217;s the guy that did, Kendall Adams,  as cited at the very top of my post &#8230; <a href="http://alwaysreformingtoscripture.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://alwaysreformingtoscripture.blogspot.com/</a> &#8230; but I would also like you do a better interview than this one. I believe he really pressed Young on important points that we all needed clarification on. It&#8217;s really easy to critique something in hind sight from behind a keyboard. I think Kendall did a great job personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Justiss</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-8630</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Justiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-8630</guid>
		<description>Here is where you could have changed everything in this conversation. When Young asked \Would you agree that God does nothing that isn&#039;t motivated by love?\ You should have pressed him because there is a central problem with that question. I would agree with that statement if we understand that God does nothing which isn&#039;t motivated by love for Himself. God, not man, is supreme in God&#039;s affections. If He weren&#039;t it would be idolatry for God. God WILL NOT be guilty of idolatry. This is good news for us because it means that God is committed to magnifying God, the only one who can eternally satisfy us. So many Christians make much of God because they believe He is committed to making much of them instead of because He is committed to enabling us to enjoy making much of Him forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is where you could have changed everything in this conversation. When Young asked \Would you agree that God does nothing that isn&#8217;t motivated by love?\ You should have pressed him because there is a central problem with that question. I would agree with that statement if we understand that God does nothing which isn&#8217;t motivated by love for Himself. God, not man, is supreme in God&#8217;s affections. If He weren&#8217;t it would be idolatry for God. God WILL NOT be guilty of idolatry. This is good news for us because it means that God is committed to magnifying God, the only one who can eternally satisfy us. So many Christians make much of God because they believe He is committed to making much of them instead of because He is committed to enabling us to enjoy making much of Him forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shack &#8211; A Review &#8211; David Westerfield &#62; Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-8229</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shack &#8211; A Review &#8211; David Westerfield &#62; Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-8229</guid>
		<description>[...] Shack Author William P. Young Denies Penal Substitution (MP3): http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shack Author William P. Young Denies Penal Substitution (MP3): <a href="http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Position Based Purely on Emotions &#8211; David Westerfield &#62; Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-5136</link>
		<dc:creator>A Position Based Purely on Emotions &#8211; David Westerfield &#62; Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-5136</guid>
		<description>[...] anonymously from the The Shack Facebook group, discussing my post found here, someone said in response to the person who posted my article as a discussion point: &#8220;____, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] anonymously from the The Shack Facebook group, discussing my post found here, someone said in response to the person who posted my article as a discussion point: &#8220;____, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Paul Young</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwesterfield.net/2009/03/shack-author-william-p-young-denies-penal-substitution-mp3/comment-page-1/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>William Paul Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwesterfield.net/?p=1928#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>William Paul Young&#039;s book, The Shack, spent 43 weeks as the number one book on the New York Times Best Seller List. Great buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Paul Young&#8217;s book, The Shack, spent 43 weeks as the number one book on the New York Times Best Seller List. Great buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
